Balkar_Singh

We can certainly look at records who opened/clicked etc by defining the criteria in a Smart List.

You can only see the performance metrics of the email - how the email performed, not the audience. The metrics in the report represent performance of Email. E.g. An email had an open rate of 10% - you can't see those 10% audience as a list of members in the "email performance report"

For people activity, try a Smart List(s), with the constraint of Test Variant, and the filters for activities you'd want to see. Use Dashboard, or Email Performance Report for Email Performance.Hope this helps!

Do apply the filter member of engagement program - not doing so could qualify records from other programs as well.The "ANY/ALL" is redundant for triggers - those are only applicable if you have 2, or more filters added to the smart list.

Thanks to organize this Brooke Bartos - these certainly go a long way!Would like to add to identify/document the actual fields which the stakeholders actually look at (versus what most of us would intuitively perceive to be the correct fields) We have seen instances of duplicate fields and expectati...

While you can use "is any" if you are doing this within the transitions rules tab (these apply the mandatory filters by default - member of this program and not a member of stream you are moving them to), but certainly there are benefits in terms of flexibility as Vladislav Vagner‌ mentions! You may...

Just in case you haven't already - would suggest applying a constraint to read only marketable records. You could also apply a spam monitor program to be better-informed of the potential bad leads for next sends. There c/should be much more to check and looking for thoughts here!

You can't import the list into a system smart list.when I use the import list into the smart list, it creates a separate list rather than importing the contactsWe can import into a static list (instead of smart list) - and if the contacts are already present in the system, they will just reflect in ...

Thanks! What could be a more valid verification, in this case? Would a form fill be more reasonable/valid, or can we use other tactics which could be more reliable? As pointed out, the terms definitely carry a broad scope, and caution needs to be exercised. The invoice example around definition of s...