Michael_Florin

1. Let me play Sanford for once and say: @GroovesMcFly, please come back to your thread.2. No, in general I would say it's rather not okay to create two Smart Campaigns with the same trigger. In most cases it's better to run a multitude of flow steps from one trigger. And in your specific case, it s...

1. Is there a way to identify everyone who is in each of the wait steps? We have three wait steps.No. The Campaign Activity report will show you how many people there are in wait steps, but it won't tell you who it is. And there is no Smart List filter to find people in wait steps. 2. Does using "Ov...

Yes. You can also infer that these data value changes are a result of that "Fill Out Facebook Lead Gen Form" activity because they A) happen at the same time stamp and B) are sorted underneath that form submission.

As much as I love the addition of Global Tokens, they also make one very old bug more annoying than ever. Because if you create Global Tokens, all tokens of the same name that live in folders and programs become overridden. And they have to be reverted to "inherited" in order to make the Global Toke...

No. Let's interpret the "First Cast" setting as the "first cast of the new schedule". And it's absolutely okay to change the schedule mid-nurture. And by the way: It's pretty much impossible to send the an email again from the same stream to the same people. The Engagement Program's intrinsic mechan...

All assets in programs have the name "program name.asset name". So the lists you create in your program have the names "ABC.1 - first list", "ABC.2 - Second list" and so on. So you can use this trigger: to make all people who will ever be added to any list in this program program members.

including non-marketable persons that we rarely reach out toOne more thought which might apply to your scenario: The longer you haven't emailed these people the more likely it is that the email will bounce. And while bounces are not necessarily a problem, they become increasingly problematic if you ...

Let's see if I understand this: You send an email to person in Italy, and your dynamic content served them a specific Italian link. And now you see that this person actually clicked a Spanish link which is not supposed to be in the Italian email? If that is your scenario, I would say no, there are n...

This is not an idea, is it? I think it has to be moved. But to your question: This filter ... ... finds only people how have last clicked an email between 120 and 150 days ago. My instance confirms that quite nicely, as we write a "Last Email Clicked Date" into a field. So the results look like thi...

It's not only a visual effect btw. It also means that this filter doesn't work correctly as it includes Smart Campaigns that actually have run.