Balkar_Singh

Laura Abbott​ - Here's an example as Josh mentions -Spam spam spam eggs spam spam spam

This really summarizes this up very well. We're working in a pretty unstructured environment, and there could be lot of ways to get into errors. While the intention is never to make errors, experimenting involves it. We've seen Marketo's domain issue, and a serious production down time last year. We...

Looking for more material suggestions, however the contact did take an affirmative action to accept invitation, or request connection, and reaching them out (for marketing) should depend on LinkedIn's Privacy Policy in this scenario.

Macarena Mazzeo​ - You can subscribe the sales members to the lists, and define the cadence. They will get the spreadsheet.

Michael Mason​ - I second that. We use Lucid Chart for same and the flow charts help Non Marketo people as well to understand what's happening. To further utilize and collaborate, we would be using Description areas to add a brief and a link to published URLs of flow charts.I would stress that docum...

Thanks Keith Nyberg​ - Yes, I would agree too. We ultimately defined it in smart list of the campaign rather referencing the same via another smart list and it worked. Though this worked, it makes sense to go by the more reliable way.

Thanks Josh Hill​ - As a practice it's safer if we use it in flow steps as suggested. Here're the screenshots to double-confirm1. Here's the smart list we created2. The smart list qualified 372 people3. The smart list referenced in the following smart campaign4. The impact of the smart campaign whic...

Enrique Casanueva Martin​ - While the feature is experimental, but we can still see some insights. E.g. we use campaign inspector to assess a summary of campaigns present and types (and you can export them) - but still, we can't rely on these absolutely, given they are experimental. It'd be best of ...