SanfordWhiteman

@Rajesh I can understand working on millions at once may not be feasible, but you can straightforwardly divide them into 36 already-unique buckets -- where mail contains @a, @b, @c... @8, @9. Then aggregate across all the buckets. Kind of a hack, of course, but don't know of another way.

Around midyear we're planning to package our internal reply-to-Marketo service as a SaaS app.We do write inbound replies to Marketo and require no special setup in your receiving e-mail client.

@Kenny E if you're trying to keep the QS and pass it verbatim to another page, your approach isn't correct:String::split() returns an array and by defintion does not include the "?" character.It's not necessary to parse location.href at all: location.search already contains the query string.Using sc...

Here's sample code that tracks YouTube events (Play, Pause, Play Until End) using Munchkin. Adapted from YT's guide here.

In order to track views/clicks within embedded pages (IFRAMEs), either:[a] the IFRAME needs to load Munchkin.jsor[b] the IFRAME needs to have code to communicate with Munchkin on the outer page (probably via HTML5 Web Messaging)If you have neither of these, then you'll only be tracking the views/cli...

Yeah, I'd go with "JS will do absolutely nothing for you." No mainstream desktop and web-based email apps will execute JS, and for good reason.

OK, that 's even easier in a way: http://jsfiddle.net/sanford/04xtuorz/5/

To turn off both default and custom opt-out, you need to make it Operational, yes.

There won't be one anonymous user in total, there will be one anonymous user per unique cookie -- i.e. per device or even per device user, depending on how you author your app.

@Takehiro are you talking about the lack of filter-by-lead? I agree this would be nice to also have in REST but if the OP wants to pull "all web traffic activity" as stated, there's no need for a filter.