Darshil_Shah1

Well, no because with the enum usage, we intend to fix that little quirk (within the script locally, of course), so for the scope of the enum, and where it's used to check values, the intended (and logical values) are considered in the velocity, i.e., "" (empty string) = false and not true.

Check out the below article: Integrating Google Analytics with Marketo On the Marketo side, you'd have to deploy the GA tracking code to your Marketo landing page templates, so it's able to track and send engagement data over to the GA. Make sure you re-approve the landing pages after you make updat...

Well, as long as the CO update activity in the person's activity log matches with what you have your tigger, i.e., CO record's EnquirySalesTimescales field gets updated and new value is what you have in your trigger's New Value constraint, the campaign would get fired and the person would flow throu...

Well, you've come across a little quirk of how velocity processes boolean values. In short, the problem is that both "1" and "" (empty string) are processed as being a true value in Velocity. Try the below script: #set( $mktoBoolean = { "1" : true, "" : false } )#foreach ($item in $customerCardList)...

When you say LPs that have been active YTD, do you mean the LPs that have some sort of person activity (e.g., visit, click) associated with them or just being in the approved state YTD? For the latter, you can just export the LPs, and filter on the basis of their current status (approved/approved wi...

That is really strange IMO, and tbh, I'm not fully convinced with the support team's response regarding the Company name causing this to fail (especially w/o proper reasoning and explanation behind it). Upon filling out the LinkedIn lead gen form, the corresponding activity should ideally get logged...

While SFDC can't see Marketo partitions, you can certainly build a routing setup in Marketo such that people get transitioned to the apt partition when they're created in Marketo based on the brand they're aligned with (you'd need proper criteria to ensure all the input sources are considered for br...

Thank you, @Jo_Pitts1! So glad we're aligned. 🙂 Hopefully, @Hoppers13 has got some idea/clarification he's been looking for.

Triggers aren't really an implied OR (as per your and @Darshil_Shah1's statement). if anything they are an implied AND. i.e. If the trigger happens AND (my filters are met) then do the flow steps. I prefer to view them as independent however (i.e. the trigger happens, now evaluate my filters). Y...

I think you're mixing triggers and filters here; the filtering logic (and, any, advanced) applies to just filters, they don't have meaning/thing to do with the triggers you have above the filters. Triggers themselves are always in OR, and people would be filtered against the filters as soon as they ...