Badges
Accepted Solutions
Likes Received
Posts
Discussions
Ideas
Blog Posts
That's what I was thinking. May have something to do with the fact that this is quite a massive database.
As a matter of fact, as this is a new engagement program effectively, it will not remember who went through which step in the nurture stream anymore. However, when you have content programs added to your stream rather than simple emails, adding the people back as members into the content programs wi...
Information on a form fill would always be in the activity data. Fills out form is activity type 2 and as far as I recall you will get the form id in the extracts, but I am unsure about the form name.
A good and thorough explanation!One other thing I would bear in mind is that your activity history in its core will not migrate along. So there might be some work arounds you may want to put in place or some custom activity data that you may want to copy across.
Good developments Sreekanth! Looking forward to the hidden link being added as well. And of course the reporting developments.
Quick update: Waiting a day or so had it working as expected. So the behaviour is still the same, but it seems to take a little time for the master unsubscribe list to be updated.
As there is a lag in the activities being registered in Marketo, you won't be able to capture this behaviour reliably with smart campaigns, but the new proximity pattern implemented by Marketo does a pretty decent job at it.
I am not sure whether that one was actually implemented. I do see it in the overview in admin, but so far have not seen any bot activities captured there across the instances I work with and I also do not see any setting to activate it.
Wondering whether anything changed recently in the durable unsubscribe process. I am working with an instance where several entities are migrating to Marketo and every time a migration happens we import the unsubscribed records that were collected in the legacy platforms into Marketo.As Marketo shou...
Are you saying that you would treat the entire lead record as a bot based on this logic? Not sure I follow that logic, as a lead can have a mix of human and bot activity. I think the key would be with identifying which activities come from a mail scanner rather than excluding a lead based on a singl...