Phillip_Wild

Agree with all of the above. I think you only get 20 segmentations total - so it's a one off, just do two emails. Ongoing, build a segmentation.

More info on this since we are having the same problem. Even a sync from Marketo won't resolve this (either through a Smart Campaign or a Single Flow Action) since Marketo looks at that regular SystemModStamp in Salesforce. Even if you force a sync, unless that timestamp is updated, it does nothing....

Thanks Patrick, good info!I have tried the comparison within the #foreach loop and that seems to work. But...getting a comparison between today's date and the values in a variable seems very difficult.$date gives you today, in a horrible format. But I can't seem to do a simple subtraction between th...

Weirdly, that's giving me a different error. Every variant has a currency in it (either a dollar, pound or euro sign) and when I put the entire string in the email script output, then put only the token in the subject line, then it either:1. Shows "£100" if the string was meant to be "(string) £100 ...

Sarah, you definitely can get these numbers...but it's not intuitive. Use a regular email report, but pull the "Was Sent Email" filter into the Smart List. Select the email you are looking to investigate, and then add a constraint "Variant". You can then select variant A or B. The report will then o...

Just thought of another possibility Alisa....Depending on how complex the email is, you could use email scripting. Email scripting can be very complex, but if you are simply modifying a few bits of text and an image or two you can do this using this technique instead.So you would send to everyone th...

Hi AlisaIt depends on exactly what you mean. If you are talking about sending an email based on Smart List filters that include multiple segmentations, you can absolutely do that. Just build out an email program and drag in the different segmentation filters.Unfortunately since you cannot evaluate c...

Hi PatrickI'm not sure if the answer below is still correct - but I've found I can only reference "first level" custom object fields through the scripting. We have a very similar situation to you, and the solution was to expose the field we want on the first level object so we can access it.One word...