Dan_Stevens_

Some additional ideas well:

Here's another one: Using the smart list workaround could get messy and cause an influx of smart lists to be created vs. creating the logic directly within the flow of the campaign.

have you tried to get rid of that "hidden" program status by running a "change program status -> not in program" on the lead ?Yes I did. With no results. Since the the lead didn't have any "visible" program statuses, the flow step to change program status to "not in program" had no effect. Nothin...

Thanks Greg - upvoted both of these. The important thing here is this "hidden" program status that gets associated to any EP member that runs through a nested program smart campaign. We can't see it, we can't modify it, we can't filter on it - nothing. It's not even documented anywhere that this ...

Yeah, given the popularity of this in such a short timeframe - and knowing that Marketo reviews these ideas on a very regular basis - I would have thought we at least would have received some sort of status change, like "we like it". But as we all know, that doesn't necessarily mean it's on the roa...

Thanks for the update and further clarification, Sandy. Makes sense now!

Hey Devraj - you might be interested in these existing ones as well:

Sandy, we're using variables for all of our call-to-action buttons, for example:....a href="${Two-col-CTA-url}And aren't experiencing the issues that you mention in your blog post (or the error that Jared received when trying to save his template). And your fix isn't included anywhere in our templa...

But those should all be centralized/global programs that react to the specific/local activity where the emails physically reside, no? We have a slew of global programs/smart campaigns that are built for this - this is just a small subset here: