SanfordWhiteman

@Brent E Reading the text version isn't about server setttings (unless you mean AD group policies which force apps on workstations to favor the text version). It's much more about client settings, like @Josh says about what kind of mail app they use. And also what settings are enforced within the ...

What exactly is the policy being enforced?Both Munchkin and Forms 2.0 scripts load from a third-party domain, as you know (they do not use third-party cookies). You might try to re-host the JavaScript itself on your domain (though that's painful to maintain). But even if that worked to load the form...

OK, found it after some hunting.Your jQuery "mmenu" plug-in duplicates the Marketo form... if it runs after the Marketo Forms 2.0 has been rendered.Solution: Render the Marketo form after the mmenu is finished. Put the Marketo code at the end of this block:$(document).ready(function() {var $mmenu_r...

Don't really need triggers to set a value. If this is a Forms 2.0 question (as tagged) then you can create a form with a hidden checkbox set to checked by default. Then you label the submit button "Send me fewer emails" as above. When someone submits the form, the value on the lead is updated, by de...

To add to the list: http://developers.marketo.com/documentation/rest/add-leads-to-list/To get a lead ID using email address as key: http://developers.marketo.com/documentation/rest/get-multiple-leads-by-filter-type

This is much the same principle I demonstrated here.In the onSuccess, read out the form fields again and then change the Thank You page URL accordingly.Note that demo goes back and queries the HTML

Wow, pretty cool. Kidding, but... I would assume the code is literally running twice and/or there are two identical container DIVs (which is actually not allowed in HTML standard but it may cause this kind of screwup). What's the URL?

@Stephanie D From what I have seen so far the old tool is much better at telling you your score based on industry-standard tests. Unfortunately it also has obsolete blacklsits in it that IBM won't fix. And it's really clumsy to use. So it's not a great scenario.Follow @Josh Hill's suggestions, wh...

@Bruce J You can search on the raw query string. But as far as persisting the Lead Source(s) to the Lead you'd have to set up a flow to write out the fields. It's way more complex IMO than having the LS automatically populated (which is why the form-field-read-from-query-string-or-cookie feature e...

You put the form anywhere you want to track UTM codes. It gets submitted automatically and the user never has to deal with it. It's exactly the same as the general suggestion about mapping UTMs to Form Fields (which in turn become fields on a Lead) except the user doesn't have to interact with the...