Badges
Accepted Solutions
Likes Received
Posts
Discussions
Ideas
Blog Posts
It might be added that Intent Analysis (and similar techniques from other anti-spam vendors) is responsible for the pesky and growing reporting problems caused by mail scanners!
As this subdomain is dedicated to Marketo-emitted emails, why not have the SPF FAIL instead of SOFTFAIL?
More fun with Munchkin domainLevel tonight. A client hired an outside design firm to work on some LPs, and the designers couldn't figure out why forms (embedded Forms 2.0) weren't posting a Munchkin cookie, even though an anonymous Visit Web Page activity was being logged (though for a new lead on e...
Adding Munchkin to a Wix websiteEither I was a bit overconfident in this Marketo Community Post from over a year ago about Munchkin & Wix, or Wix has changed something since. (Can't track changes on their side, not being a real Wix user myself.) Either way, as of Spring '16, Wix makes you jump throu...
A record that is NULL or does not exist will break an SPF record. This means be extra careful about typos in your record.Not all mechanisms that have no answers (but where the domain does exist) will instantly break an SPF record. You can have up to 2 lookups during MX or A resolution that return ...
Sounds good. I don't see any change in the published record yet.
Yes, the SolidOpinion service is like Disqus or LiveFyre, though without the brand recognition. Ghost blogs don't have built-in comments. It's a known gap, but the blogging platform is great in every other way, so we use a plugin.I'm happy to add, verbatim, any official Marketo response.You might ...
Thanks for this, Kristen. But I find the examples incomplete because they don't reflect the click tracking host (branding domain). It's the visit to that host, and not the presence of the mkt_tok query param, that tracks email link clicks. Without mkt_tok, you can't associate the Munchkin session...
Fair point. I haven't seen any clients who are configured using the multiple DNS entry spanning SPF configurationIt's not multiple DNS entries. It's a single DNS TXT entry with multiple text strings, as specifically designed into the TXT record type and advised in the SPF RFC.but this approach work...
This post has spurred a new series of posts on my own blog: http://blog.teknkl.com/third-marketo-users-broken-spf/