Badges
Accepted Solutions
Likes Received
Posts
Discussions
Ideas
Blog Posts
Anonymous Lead Promotion to Known Lead – Munchkin V2 Behavior outlines that only some certain steps, including Change Score, run when an anonymous lead is promoted / associated.My question is, within a Flow, is there a condition I can add within a choice step to only run Change Score if the events a...
Is there any on-platform way to increment or decrement a lead score based on another score?For example, let's say I have ScoreA = 10 and ScoreB = 3. I would want to Change Score A such that it's decremented by ScoreB and is updated to 7.I think I could just build a webhook to do this, but at scale i...
Hi Josh. Not sure I follow. Are you saying that maybe I could prevent the decrement from happening if I could tell that events were being replayed during association?Even if I could prevent it from happening at that moment, I'm not sure how I would actually decrement the score by the appropriate amo...
I've been auditing a bunch of our campaigns and found that scoring is totally out of wack - presumably due to Munchkin v2 behavior.We keep a "Master" score for a bunch of behavioral categories based on web activity. When you visit relevant pages, we bump up your score, but we also want this score to...
Hi Sanford. It seems like what I have down gives some balance between adding a little safety and not increasing complexity too much, adding external dependencies, or slowing down performance by more than a couple hundred ms, but I'd love to hear more about your thoughts on compare-and-swap via webho...
Thanks for the advice! While normally, I think readability is king, I was opting for the positive lookup to go along with the Smart List Best Practices #3:Use positive over negative operators - While "not" filters are available, they have to search the entire data set in your instance, which can be ...
Thanks for taking a look Denise.It reads in a confusing way, but I think it's doing what I want, while avoiding "not it" / negation for the best list querying performance although I haven't had a chance to test yet. The intent is that we don't remove from flow if you're still in the list, then conti...
Seems like without the ability to lock, you basically can't ever implement at-most-once. Outside of Marketo we use Pub/Sub, which has at-least-once delivery as is common with distributed systems, so we have to track each message ID centrally in MySQL with locking to avoid duplicate processing.It see...
Hi Denise,Yes in addition to lack of "locking read" support for exclusive access to the list within a few second time period (much like Sanford is talking about and I'm thinking about as an engineer), I'm also concerned about the gap of time between member list creation and campaign execution (from ...
Sanford Whiteman and others gave me some great advice on how I could use lists as a work queue to work around Munchkin v2 limitations on what actions could be done when a lead was associated: When a lead is merged / associated how can I make previously anonymous activity send an email? I'm looking...