Grégoire_Miche2

Hi Michael,AFAIK, when a second person comes on the same cooked machine as a previous one, the cookie value remains attached to the first person.But anyway, the anonymization would apply to a person, not a cookie. And when anonymise, that person's cookie values would be discarded. And since a cookie...

Hi Veronica,Since it would be a setting in the admin, it would be up to you to activate the feature or not.Nevertheless, sync'ing a Marketo program to an existing SFDC campaign almost always lead to a sync issue, because of discrepancies in the member names. We instruct to our customer to never do i...

Hi Christophe,I added it here​ but honestly, I do not think that using this "activities" feature is a good idea:It has the big drawback to quickly saturate the SFDC instance with data and I have often seen after a few month the necessity to bulk delete these activities in SFDC in order to avoid buyi...

Close to being a bug...Added here: Just do it! Marketo so-called minor missing features

Quick question, what are the DVC reasons and source containing when the value change is triggered by an API call?Greg

HI Dan,My experience from other platforms shows in fact that trying to do in within the flow can also get messy -Greg

Hi Folks,The workaround is easy: create smart lists with the complex logic and use member of smart list conditions in the choices.-Greg

It has to be optional. Not everyone is ready to migrate to lightning, mainly because of its slowness.-Greg

Hi Carey,The difficulty is that you can have multiple models and one person can be a member of multiple models. In this case, how would you display it ?-Greg

Corrected