Badges
Accepted Solutions
Likes Received
Posts
Discussions
Ideas
Blog Posts
Indeed, this is available.BtW, in which version was this introduced? I never saw this one documented.-Greg
It would be very powerful if we could define some campaign parameters that could be passed when calling the smart campaign and would remain valid for the member as long as it's in the flow. Each member in the SC could have a different value of the parameter.These would be very similar to function pa...
Fully agreed this is especially dangerous in the GDPR Era...Added here: Marketo GDPR Compliance-a summary of key ideas -Greg
Hi Elsa,we wouldn't be required to delete or anonymize form submission data just because they didn't consent to future communicationsAgreed as long as the forms are designed to clearly separate the 2 consents.-Greg
Hi All,We just discovered a limitation of the audit trail today, that we confirmed with support.When you change the rule of a smart list from "Use any" to "Use All", the activity that is logged in the audit trail show that list has been changed, but does not precisely say what has been changed, maki...
Yes, Sanford is clearly right on this. Now, you can make the consent to store linked to the submission of the form, meaning you do not necessarily need a specific checkbox on this. But you need to make it clearly explicit. See for instance this form: https://www.salesforce.com/form/events/webinars/f...
I do not know if any other idea reached 4350 points in less than 4 months... This is really something we almost all need, and quick. we should take any occasion to tell Marketo about the need.-Greg