SanfordWhiteman

OK, use my code in the meantime!

If you're trying to match a style guide, then the extra DOM elements (spacers elements, row wrappers, etc.) aren't going to match up.Disabling all Marketo styles + stylesheets is very useful (see MktoForms2 :: Destyle Marketo form​) but I don't think the final goal should be a destyled form that is,...

Do you want a form without styles, or a form without styles and without any additional DOM elements? Form styling typically depends on the HTML fragment of the form. But if Marketo removed everything but

I have always been skeptical of the email follow up method because we have several instances where the lead doesn't receive our Marketo email ..Hmm, that's going to make them hard to acquire, though!even though we have DKIM and SPF set upWell, unless you have a branded sender domain, SPF doesn't mat...

This is great. I am privately sharing with a colleague (to keep him anonymous) who was talking about this same thing and more. Let's talk about it offline.

Thanks, Greg. That's what I was trying to get at, though perhaps I came on a little strong: using SFDC as an audit trail for itself is technically infeasible, plus more data pushed via the SFDC API is a dangerous thing.

p.s. if you could take away your down vote I would appreciate it. I can't just take it away b/c Jive won't let me.

I just don't see how having additional data replicated into SFDC, when the activity sync process itself is already throttled to one per lead per day to prevent instance overload, would be accurate enough for debugging purposes. The authoritative record of the form post will always be stored in Marke...

How could a Filled Out Form activity that does not sync with SFDC (again, you said "before sync") be reflected in SFDC?Also, are you aware that only one such activity per lead per day will ever be synced?

I'm referring to the FoF activity in Marketo (you said "before Sync").