Badges
Accepted Solutions
Likes Received
Posts
Discussions
Ideas
Blog Posts
Thanks Sanford. You are right after some confirmed testing. Re-reading, this article looks correct. Going to delete my comment
Hi Greg,Thanks for the info. Did you do any testing post-upgrade for emails with NO template? A majority of our emails have no template, we have just updated the HTML ourselves on a one-off basis. I would assume there were probably no code/content loss with these, although I will likely still tes...
It seems like section 1-tests and discovery, point 3 may be inaccurate now. It looks like you can edit v1 emails after turning on editor 2.0 without needing to attach a 2.0 template to it (Marketo documentation below). It will automatically switch to a v2 email, but the template will be the same (...
Grégoire MichelYou can still use tokens in Editor 2.0 correct? Variables do not replace tokens, they are just a similar feature. Thanks,Mike
B) Assuming no costs are added but behavior for a channel is set to inclusive, what happens to Program members by cost timeframe report? I assume that data would not be available? (Side note: Wish Marketo had a Program members by membership date report.)This is why I just sync everything over to SF...
Changing acquisition doesn’t remove program membership automatically. You need to remember to remove the record as a member from the original acquisition program using the following flow step.Above is correct, but only thing I will add is that this in many cases should be unnecessary. The acquisiti...
Greg has a pretty good idea above everyone should check out. The subscription center is nice, but excluding the correct audiences from certain emails is prone to human error and there needs to be a more automated way of handling excluding different subscriptions from certain emails or programs. -Mi...