Kurt_Koller

Sanford,Could I bring you in pro bono to back me up in meetings, especially with enterprise clients? You could back up things I say about security, and you could probably also help with the 400 meetings that will happen when you try to get a proxy set up within a large company's infrastructure, eith...

Sanford -I'll just say that whenever we work with clients, particularly larger ones, this kind of solution almost always results in a no-go. We can't provide that on our AWS for our clients because security people don't like it/won't have it. If we suggest this to clients, even if they have AWS, man...

I created an idea for this here:https://nation.marketo.com/t5/Ideas/Webhooks-support-additional-methods-PUT-DELETE/idi-p/312235since we have the same need. Upvote it if you want the additional method support, if it gets enough votes maybe it'll happen.

I'd personally love to see this, I just ran into this where we were hoping to do a pretty great integration with something, and it requires PUT for updates and we can't call it even with ?_method=PUT

Sanford,Thanks for this. We are definitely seeing things vanish, I assumed there would always be a delete lead or merge lead, I think that was a bad assumption. I'm going to verify today or Monday via the deleted lead endpoint, and then I guess I need to build a rotating/drip sync-check to determine...

Yes we have. That endpoint doesn't give merges, just delete lead (37) activities which we also get through bulk already. There are many leads which are no longer in the system which never had a delete lead (37) or merge lead (32) activity, so I'm looking for other ways a lead could be deleted from m...

Well I'm going to maybe blow your mind some more here because those show up I believe as a lead merge activity. We then take the targetid of the merge and go back with non-bulk API for any leads that have been made known and get their activities. It's not great.Also speaking of merge, we also need t...