Denise_Greenb12

Nick,This seems too obvious to ask so forgive me - but you didn't say so I'll ask just in case: do you have a smart campaign that changes the status to registered in response to the form fill?Denise

That makes sense for you. For someone (like me) who doesn't know how to use Velocity, random sample is an easy solution. It doesn't have to be half-and-half. You can use Random Sample to split into multiple segments.

You may be right. If it's for A/B split purposes why not just use random sample rather than split the audience into lists?

Hi Jon,I think you mean to say Member of List "Not in" rather than "in" in Flow step 1. Otherwise, looks good.Denise

Hi Heather,You could have the campaign that adds people to the list wait 90 days and then send the email.I.e., your flow would be:1) Add to List2) Wait 90 days3) Send emailHowever, I agree with Sandy that the 90 day time period is potentially problematic because that's when the Added to List activit...

Good point on the embedded form, Sandy!

Hi Jennifer,I'm not so sure this is a great idea because someone may download the content and forget where they placed it and use your web site as an easy place to find it again. Plus you don't want to cause ill-will.Having said that, are you trying to prevent someone from filling out the same form ...

Hi Guillaume,Why the two lists for "Madame" vs "First Name"? If the "Madame" list is for people whose first name you don't know, there is a much simpler way to implement that doesn't require lists at all. Simply use "Madame" as the default value in the token. If First Name is empty, the token will a...

Adding to what Sandy said - filters and triggers that say "in past 90 days" include in past 1 day, 2 days, 3 days, etc. all the way up to past 90 days whereas you want people add exactly 90 days ago.

Hi Jon,Re: "Could this SC be invoked twice at the exact same time e.g. once from a scheduled campaign, and another time from a triggered campaign? If that was the case, maybe the user gets 2 emails."Sanford is right. However, it seems like you could minimize this possibility by adding the choice to ...