Grégoire_Miche2

Hi John,If the choice of the follow-up is based on a value entered in the form, you also can use dynamic follow-up, available in forms 2.0.Hope this helps,Greg

You may be able to ask support to become a Beta user of the custom object. Once activated, you can see them in the lead detail screen, as a separate tab. But you will ne be able to edit them. Then you will be able to add custom object through te API or with an import.

Try something such as :.mktoRequiredField .mktoAsterix { float:right; text-align : left;}

Hi again Tomoe,As the segmentation is based on past behavior and you cannot use lead history to compute segments, I understand why you want to use lists. As Josh said, I personally would have preferred to create a field and populated it with a "change data value" in your trigger and then I would hav...

Hi Tomoe,Yes, your understanding is correct. Now, the fact that your segment is not increasing can come from a faulty implementation of the segmentation. Sorry for the basic question : have you approved the draft of your segmentation ?If so, have a look at one of the leads that should be in the segm...

Use a batch smart campaign that send the email, make sure that every lead can run through the flow every time and schedule it run every Tuesday at a specific time. Your smart campaign will only need a "send email" flow step.The target of your smart campaign will usually be a smart list that will sel...

Hi Prabash,I would rather set the Account VerificationLink as a simple text, not a text area. It should just contain the URL for the verification link, but with ​ being removed from the URL when you insert with the API.Then, in the email, I would create a CTA in the text with link = {{lead.accountVe...

Hi Karina,The Adbridge functionality for Google is very different to the integration for facebook and linkedin. I had a discussion with Cathal Moran recently and he confirmed this. Here are his words :The Google Adbridge feature is all about adwords and pushing conversion data from Marketo into AdWo...

an also with this one, which is more ancient :