Kenny_Elkington

At this time there's not really a better way. We are working on providing a means of securely transferring credentials between Marketo and ISVs, which would eliminate the need for an end-user to access and transfer credentials to application providers, but this won't become available this year. Th...

What's the benefit of this over deleting an existing record and creating a new client? The credentials still need to be updated in the third-party service if the secret was changed, and deletion immediately revokes API client credentials.

What is an excel client library? I'm not familiar with the concept.

>forces end users like us pay for increasing daily volume API limits.This is not true, Peter. Bulk Export is metered by size-on-disk, and not by data transfer size, so this does not affect your quota utilization..

We'll get this fixed in the next doc update cycle.

Jeff Shearer Can you clarify what you're looking for that isn't already covered by Trigger Tokens?

So is the issue that the population of the Anonymous IP field doesn't create a data value change activity that you can trigger off of?

I don't really understand what you're asking for. Care to elaborate, and maybe provide an example of what this might look like?

To answer your question, no there really isn't a compelling reason. Are there specific endpoints that you're referring to that accept name, but not ID?

This is possible today using a little elbow grease and the Request Campaign API. You can follow the pattern described here: https://developers.marketo.com/blog/sending-transactional-emails-with-the-marketo-rest-api-part-2-custom-content/ Instead of Send Email + Email Asset, though, you just embed ...