Kurt_Koller

This has been added to the documentation and is now officially supported. This can now be closed out, I don't see a way to do it.

The RFC for OAuth 2.0 is pretty clear:https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6749#section-3.2 Since requests to the token endpoint result in the transmission of clear-text credentials (in the HTTP request and response), the authorization server MUST require the use of TLS as described in Section 1....

Sanford,Could I bring you in pro bono to back me up in meetings, especially with enterprise clients? You could back up things I say about security, and you could probably also help with the 400 meetings that will happen when you try to get a proxy set up within a large company's infrastructure, eith...

Sanford -I'll just say that whenever we work with clients, particularly larger ones, this kind of solution almost always results in a no-go. We can't provide that on our AWS for our clients because security people don't like it/won't have it. If we suggest this to clients, even if they have AWS, man...

Highly needed!

I created an idea for this here:https://nation.marketo.com/t5/Ideas/Webhooks-support-additional-methods-PUT-DELETE/idi-p/312235since we have the same need. Upvote it if you want the additional method support, if it gets enough votes maybe it'll happen.

I'd personally love to see this, I just ran into this where we were hoping to do a pretty great integration with something, and it requires PUT for updates and we can't call it even with ?_method=PUT