Badges
Accepted Solutions
Likes Received
Posts
Discussions
Ideas
Blog Posts
In that case, the same solution would work, just make add the above choice to your Send Email flow steps: "Member of Smart Campaign is not Clicked, Opened." And make the default Choice "Do Nothing", like this (ignore the red lines - they are just there because this is an example I created for you wi...
Hi Shawn,What about if the lead clicks a link in the 2nd or 3rd email? Do you also want to then remove that lead from receiving the subsequent email? Assuming you have a Smart Campaign that changes the program status to "Clicked" if a lead clicks a link in any of the 4-email sequence, add this choic...
Hi Elsa,I think Sanford is correct. See the following quotation from this site: General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) – Final text neatly arrangedI went to "Key Issues" at the top and clicked on "Consent.""Processing personal data is generally forbidden if it is not expressly allowed by law, or ...
Justin Norris - That was me who inquired. And that's the answer I heard as well: not currently on the roadmap. Disappointing!
I don't know. It seems to me there is room for error due to unpredictable timing. For example:Trigger: Data Value Changes->Opt-In = TrueFilter:Filled Out Form->Is Any-> In past 10 minutesFlow:If Most Recent Form name is ABCChange Opt-In Source to Filled Out Form ABCOrTrigger: Fills Out FormFilter:Da...
Hi Greg,Thank you! Silly me - I realized after I posted the question that I could just look in the activity log. It's frustrating to me that you can't access the values in the "source" and "reason" constraints in the flow. For example, with GDPR and CASL in mind, wouldn't it be useful to have a toke...
Yes, it could! I just voted for the idea. Thank you!- Denise
Hi Darrell -As I said in my initial post, I have a workaround and wasn't looking for help. Thanks anyway for the offer!Denise
Hi Sandy - Sorry it's taken me so long to answer. Thank you very much for your reply and the detailed explanation! If I could think of a succinct way to make this into an "Idea" I would. I find this very frustrating as it seems to make filters inherently unreliable. - Denise
Plus you'd have the opportunity to analyze and try to improve your opt-in rates. E.g., if LP "A" has a high non-opt-in rate, perhaps changing the copy could help improve that. And it would be interesting to know if LP A has a higher non-opt-in rate than LP B. If the data just disappears, we won't kn...