Yaron_Meiner

Guys, forgive me for being snarky here, not every day i get to challenge @SanfordWhiteman 's solution. i deserve a marketo award for this.   There is a way to compare fields with two smart Campaigns if the result here is to make sure two fields are not equal.   Let be field named XXX Let there be two fields we want to compare: YYY,ZZZ Smart Campaign #1 - trigger by data value changed to YYY,ZZZ and lead is created. - Filter by criteria of your choice. - Workflow:  -- Change data value of XXX by the content of YYY -- Wait 2 seconds. -- Change data value of XXX by the content of ZZZ Smart Campaign 2 - Trigger: Data value changed for XXX twice in the past minute. - Filters: campaign #1 was requested - Workflow - whatever you want to do if the fields are not equal   You can do the same thing with testing if fields are equal by adding a third campaign that is triggered by the first campaign after 10-15 seconds to make sure the lead is not a member of the second campaign but this is a bit convoluted and i didn't need it. ... View more

what about anonymous information? views, clicks etc. ... View more

I think that after two years it does not look like marekto is eager to make this happen. I don't see a way to remove personal details completely without deleting the record.   ... View more

I understand that but what happens when the user decides to put 'null' in one of the fields? The two solutions here, in my opinion, can be: As suggested - to replace the value of the field to something else. [n/a] might be a good solution because it keeps the field with some value. this can be done either with a smart campaign or with a piece of code  My preferred action - to return to form on validation level or mark to the user that they have to put a real company name (and risk that NULL inc is not using a shortened brand name) I would actually want to see it as a functionality of the embedded forms.  ... View more

I just tested it, it happens also with embedded Marketo forms... ... View more

I thought about this but it means that i need to edit the munchkin code. I'm trying to stick to original since I am using a maintained Drupal module but I think i am changing my approach now a bit. The only reason i need to not track the specific page is that i am using it to retrieve the marketo cookie by a get from another site.    It's a chicken and an egg thing - if the user is new to the websites and travels in a secondary site, i want them to be introduced to the cookie in the main site so i can share the cookie id between sites (iframe comm, you wouldn't expect me to do simple things anyway 😁 ). when i look at the activity log of the user - I see the visits to the page in the iframe. It could be an ok solution but our salespeople use sales insights and look at the pages the user was looking at.   I guess the solution would be to transfer back the page with parms to a custom page that is viewed and use apiOnly + shoot a visitWebPage.   ... View more

The way i did it: I added the munchkin token (_mkto_trk cookie) to every lead in intercom. Lead is synced to sf and from there to marketo (takes about 10 minutes, since we already have bizdev in touch with the lead it is ok by us) - intercom deliveres - Name, email, company. When lead arrives to marketo - webhook to intercom to complete all additional details  - country, state/province, ip, etc. in this call we also get the munchkin token. With the stored munchkin token - second webhook to marketo itself - /save2 that includes  email & mkt_trk, (we created a dedicated form i named associate lead) - this associates the lead to the anonymous lead the user was in the beginning. Zero code integration achieved (well, except for the embed and mapping of fields to intercom but that's local JS). * Yes i did submit a form from marketo webhook to marketo save2 and it works, saves the need to authenticate. What we are missing, is the ability to associate lead as a smart campaign, it could save a webhook, but it works. ... View more

Yeah, that's what i am trying to avoid... if I would have written the babel fish here, I would have went with intercom -> api (with intercom event webhook and api call) -> marketo /save2 but its another piece of code to maintain and monitor. If i can find a way to associate/merge with a smart campaign it could be ideal. ... View more

I'm using a marketo webhook to draw the information from Intercom are you suggesting to trigger a webhook from marketo to marketo? possible race condition? ... View more

This will help us a lot! ... View more

I am having the same issue. I am trying to avoid server activity on ajax calls to marketo which means that i have to pass the gap of the cross origin issue. Is there a way to get the response wrapped for jsonp?  ... View more