This isn't a Munchkin issue. You need to talk to your web developer about the HTML + CSS differences between the pages.
If you can prove that stripping the <SCRIPT> tag is the only difference between two pages that have different layouts, I'll take a look. So far it's been a wild goose chase with other differences between the pages. Like I said, you'd have to have some seriously suspicious CSS if removing Munchkin had any effect at all (as in CSS that specified an nth-child and expected the <SCRIPT> to be in the DOM, something like that).
I'm happy to look further at links to two landing pages whose only difference is whether they have the Munchkin <SCRIPT> tags. The background about the templates isn't sufficient, since so far you've sent me links to LPs that differ in other ways, such as CSS.
Consider Occam's Razor. Is the simplest explanation that an analytics script is affecting layout? Or is the simplest explanation that you introduced other changes, but since those weren't documented, all you remember is disabling Munchkin?
Have you looked at the HTML? I mean actually looked at the differences between these pages?
These are obviously different. In one case the form is above the "For the love of..." section in the DOM. In the other case the form is below "For the love of...." That's going to contribute mightily to layout differences.
This is what I mean when I say the pages do not differ only by the absence/presence of Munchkin. That's clearly not the case.
.png)
Adchoices