*Posted on behalf of internal Bizible expert Pierre Cirac*
Deals by Marketing Channel
This report would essentially be the same as the New Opportunities by Marketing Channel example except the metric has now changed from open Opportunities to closed won Deals. The metric should always be what informs which attribution model to use. Considering we’re now looking at closed won Deals and their related BATs, we should use a model that represents the entire buyer’s journey (Deal). This ensures any marketing touch track during the buyer’s journey receives attribution credit:
Question |
What marketing channels are influencing Deals to close? |
Report Type |
Bizible Attribution Touchpoints with Opportunities (CRM) Metric: Deals (Bizible Discover) |
Filters |
|
Date Field / Date Type |
Opportunity Closed Date |
Date Range |
select desired date range |
Group / Dimension |
Marketing Channel |
Optimal Models |
Full Path *SUM the ‘Full Path’ fields in your CRM reports (Count - Full Path, Revenue - Full Path) |
REMINDER: It’s crucial to remember to filter for the specific Opportunities you want to include in BAT based reporting, especially when it comes ‘Open Opportunities and Pipeline Revenue’ vs. ‘Deals and Closed Won Revenue’. This is typically done via an ‘Opportunity Stage’ filter (the ‘Opportunity Won’ = true/false filter can also be very helpful here).
Related Resources:
Reporting on Bizible Attribution Touchpoints: New Opportunities by Marketing Channel
Reporting on Bizible Attribution Touchpoints: ROI
Reporting on Bizible Touchpoints: Leads with Bizible Touchpoints
Reporting on Bizible Touchpoints: Marketing Qualified Leads with Bizible Touchpoints
Reporting on Bizible Touchpoints: Bizible Persons with Bizible Touchpoints
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.