Which is more efficient: web page "contains" or "is"?
When using a "Visits Web Page" trigger in a Smart Campaign, is it a best practice to use the "contains" or "is" constraint? And when entering the URL of the web page, I'm also aware that you need to strip out the http:// from the URL for it to work properly.
Re: Which is more efficient: web page "contains" or "is"?
If you want to add a trigger for tracking visits to a single web page on your website, use "is" with the URL of the page. However, if you want to add trigger for visits to any page of the website, you should use "contains" and add the host name for your website.