Howdy!
I have a quick question...
I have an email test with 2 subject lines and 2 tweaks to copy ( a 2 x 2 test) with a total population of 160,000 emails. I want to set the test up like this (whole email test):
Email 1 (Subject Line A, Copy A)
Email 2 (Subject Line B, Copy A)
Email 3 (Subject Line B, Copy A)
Email 4 (Subject Line B, Copy B)
If I'm just looking for data and not necessarily a 'winner' and will be uploading a static list for this test, can I set the test sample size to 100% without any issues?
Thanks!
Solved! Go to Solution.
Chelsey,
The easiest way to ensure this is done correctly is to just duplicate the emails so there are 4 in total, each with their own subject line/copy combination. Then create a smart campaign and have a flow step like this:
1. Send Email
Choice 1: if random sample is 25%: send Email 1
Choice 2: if random sample is 25%: send Email 2
Choice 3: if random sample is 25%: send Email 3
Choice 4: if random sample is 25%: send Email 4
Default Choice: do nothing
This ensures every person in the list is only sent one variation of the email and each email is sent to about the same size of the list (25% of 160,000).
Chelsey,
The easiest way to ensure this is done correctly is to just duplicate the emails so there are 4 in total, each with their own subject line/copy combination. Then create a smart campaign and have a flow step like this:
1. Send Email
Choice 1: if random sample is 25%: send Email 1
Choice 2: if random sample is 25%: send Email 2
Choice 3: if random sample is 25%: send Email 3
Choice 4: if random sample is 25%: send Email 4
Default Choice: do nothing
This ensures every person in the list is only sent one variation of the email and each email is sent to about the same size of the list (25% of 160,000).
Thanks, Devraj. I was trying to keep it in an email program, but your route seems like a cleaner option.
It's much easier for reporting purposes as well just to have each email variation created as a separate email then you don't need to mess with the test variant constraints.
That's very true. Thanks, Devraj!