I would like this as well. Our example is we have a lead form that we've been using for about a year, that has an outdated name. I'd like to rename the Smart Campaign, while maintaining all historical information about leads that have already been through the campaign. If I clone and archive the previous campaign, I will lose all information from the previous campaign.
Agree that this should be a the very top priority for the Marketo product. What is the estimated time of delivery for this badly needed feature?
Also curious why Marketo would have been developed this way in the first place. Was this a major oversight or was there actually a reason to build it this way?
Agree that this should be a the very top priority for the Marketo product. What is the estimated time of delivery for this badly needed feature?
Also curious why Marketo would have been developed this way in the first place. Was this a major oversight or was there actually a reason to build it this way?
Agree that this should be a the very top priority for the Marketo product. What is the estimated time of delivery for this badly needed feature?
Also curious why Marketo would have been developed this way in the first place. Was this a major oversight or was there actually a reason to build it this way?
I'm also somewhat befuddled by this lack of functionality - can anyone think of anoher application that doesn't allow you to rename objects? I don't think I can. Although there's a workaround, it's a pain to have to clone everything to fix a single typo or add a suffix, for example. I'd like to add my vote for this much needed idea.
I totally agree with all of this...we are just getting going using the tool and thought it was a bug as well. This should definitely be on a list for development. Hopefully you guys can take a break from Spark and work on this much needed enhancement. Thanks
It's shocking that you can't do this already. I have moved things into programs, which essentially changed the name by appending the program name to it... and have seen this break existing fucntionality in major ways... so maybe it's less trivial then we imagine.