Knowledgebase

Featured article

Included in this article Overview Data you’ll get from Email Bounces Bounce Categories Hard Bounces Soft Bounces Bounce Details Building the Directory 1. Create 6 custom fields 2. Create a Program to house everything 3. Create a Static List 4. Create two Smart Campaigns Smart Campaign One - Logging Email Bounces with Bounce Details Smart Campaign Two - Remove Leads From the List After Successful Deliveries 5. Create Custom List View Showing Bounce Details Overview Bounce activities carry details for why the email was bounced, but it’s housed within the activity log entry, not in a field on the lead record, so it’s difficult to export that data. This article will show you how to extract that information to create a directory of leads bouncing emails and how to make the list automatically update. This will also create counters for bounces and successful re-deliveries after bounces happen. Data you’ll get from Email Bounces Bounce Categories Email bounces come in different types depending on why the email was bounced; Hard Bounces or Soft Bounces. Hard Bounces Hard Bounces come in two types, Category 1 and Category 2. Category 1 bounces are emails that have been marked as spam by the recipient mail server. Many email servers monitor blacklists or spam traps, so after de-listing with them, leads that have had a Category 1 bounce previously may be able to receive emails again. Category 2 bounces occur due to an email address that is invalid or doesn’t exist. Soft Bounces Soft Bounces come in three different types, Categories 3, 4 or 9. Category 3 bounces are usually temporary, caused by full mailboxes, timeouts, or throttling. Any email with this designation has been retried for up to 24 hours (36 for AOL). Category 4 bounces are caused by technical problems, Transient Failures, Admin Failures, DNS Failures. Any email with this designation has been retried for up to 24 hours (36 for AOL). Category 9 bounces are unknown, undetermined or gibberish details. Any email with this designation has been retried for up to 24 hours (36 for AOL). Bounce Details When an email is bounced, the recipient mail server includes details of why it was bounced. These are created by the admin of the recipient mail server and vary greatly, but most will give some explanation that can give valuable information. Email Bounce Codes Building the Directory 1. Create 6 custom fields You’ll need 6 custom fields, two DateTime fields, two Score fields, and two String fields Name the DateTime fields “Bounce Date” and “Email Delivered After Bounce”. Name the Score fields “Email Bounces” and “Deliveries After Bounces” Name the String fields “Email Bounce Details” and “Email Bounce Category” Directions for creating Custom Fields can be found here: Create a Custom Field in Marketo 2. Create a Program to house everything Use a default program type and name it "Directory of Leads Bouncing Emails". Info on creating programs can be found here: Create a Program 3. Create a Static List This static list will be your actual directory that contains all of the leads that are currently bouncing emails. Name it "Active Bounce List". Info on creating a static list can be found here: Create a Static List 4. Create two Smart Campaigns These two Smart Campaigns are what will be used to add and remove leads from your active bounce list. Info on creating Smart Campaigns can be found here: Create a New Smart Campaign Smart Campaign One - Logging Email Bounces with Bounce Details Your first Smart Campaign will be used to listen for any email bounces that occur. The campaign will populate the “Bounce Date”, “Email Bounce Category” and “Email Bounce Details” fields. It will then add one point to the “Email Bounces” score field which can be used to count how many bounces have occurred per lead. Lastly, the campaign will add the lead to the static list which will be an active directory of leads who are bouncing emails. Campaign Smart List Use the two triggers of “Email Bounces” and “Email Bounces Soft” in the Smart List. Set both triggers to “is any” so that they will fire whenever any email bounces for any reason. Campaign Flow The Flow of the campaign will have 5 flow steps. The flow will use a System Token and some Trigger Tokens, which can be used to pull details out of the action that activated the trigger. In this case, the Trigger Tokens will be pulling out the details on why the emails were bounced. That info is in the bounce message and is logged in the lead's activity log. Normally you'd have to comb through the activity log one at a time to find these details for each individual lead. This method, however, will pull the details out automatically for all leads. Flow Step 1: Change Data Value Attribute: “Bounce Date” New Value: {{system.dateTime}} Flow Step 2: Change Data Value. Attribute: “Email Bounce Category” New Value: {{trigger.category}} Flow Step 3: Change Data Value Attribute: “Email Bounce Details” New Value: {{trigger.details}} Flow Step 4: Change Score Score Name: “Email Bounces” Change: +1 Flow Step 5: Add to List List Name: “Active Bounce List” Smart Campaign Two - Remove Leads From the List After Successful Deliveries Campaign Smart List The Smart List of the campaign will need a trigger for “Email is Delivered” set to “is any” and also a filter of “Member of List” looking just for leads that belong to your Static List. This way, the campaign will only apply to leads who have had an email bounce but have then had an email successfully delivered afterwards. Campaign Flow The Flow of the campaign will have 3 flow steps to do the following; log when the email was delivered, add a point to the "Deliveries After Bounce" Score Field, and remove the lead from the "Active Bounce List". Flow Step 1: Change Data Value Attribute: “Email Delivered After Bounce” New Value: {{system.dateTime}} Flow Step 2: Change Score Score Name: “Deliveries After Bounces” Change: +1 Flow Step 3: Remove from List List Name: Operational.Active Bounce List 5. Create Custom List View Showing Bounce Details The custom fields you’ve created for email bounce information won’t show automatically in the view of your list. You can create a new view of the list to show just this information so that when it is exported it will give you only the email bounce information you need. Once the list has the necessary details, it can be exported with those columns included so that you can work with it. You can identify emerging trends and issues with your deliverability by looking for common themes among the bounce details. Directions for creating Custom Views can be found here

Issue Leads are stuck in a smart campaign's Wait Step and have not moved onto next steps, even though the Wait Step has been updated/shortened and the lead should move onto the next step. Solution When a lead enters a Wait Step, it remains in the Wait Step as defined at the moment they entered it. For example, if the lead enters a 1 week Wait Step, it will remain in the step for 1 week. If the Wait Step is updated to be longer or shorter (for example, shortened to 3 days or extended to 2 weeks), the lead that already entered the Wait Step (when it was 1 week) will remain in the Wait Step for the original duration. New leads entering the Wait Step will abide by the new duration.

Summary New checkbox for query parameters available when adding new content or editing current content. Issue You were previously unable to specify query parameters for predictive content, and query parameters were not used when adding new content, editing current content, and reporting on URL clicks. Autodiscovery works by adding a new URL to the DB, and later on, clicking counts are accumulated against the newly found asset. The asset is determined based on the URL (and there, it previously didn't account for anything that followed the ? in the URL. The same was used as a validation when a user added new content. The rule to determine this part of the URL, minus the query parameters, was a requirement back then and was taken into account during design. Solution As you add predictive content from the predictive content page, you need to have the checkbox on this page to allow the user to decide whether they want to include/exclude the query parameters while adding it. The same thing should be followed for editing predictive content as well. Engineering built a nuanced approach that provided flexibility to include or exclude query patterns in determining a unique URL and added a feature to include query parameters when manually creating a piece of content. It should rightly identify the right asset to record clicks/views against as well.

Summary When renaming a field in a CRM Custom/Entity it does not reflect the change in the constraint of filters/triggers/ Issue I renamed a field in my CRM Custom Entity/Object (MSD/SFDC) and I refreshed the schema. I can see the field name change reflected in the CRM Custom Entity/Object, but when I look for the field in constraint for filter/trigger I only see the old name. Environment Smart List Solution The workaround is that the customer can create a new field on the SFDC side and copy all the values from the old field to the new one. Then, this field can be used in smartlist filters. Old field can be disabled after that. Root Cause We are not propagating field name changes from SDFC to Marketo.

Summary How to see all the historical Support cases created for Marketo Issue How to see all the Marketo Support cases, attachments, and comments related to your historical support cases Environment Support Portal Solution Authorized Contacts can see the cases that they personally created/own, and the Support Admins can access the all cases on the entitlement from within the Support portal. Below is a community article with additional information and instructions: Managing your Support Cases

Summary Mismatch between "Added to [custom object]" and "Has [custom object]" filters for a SFDC Custom object Issue You build a Smart List for "Added to [custom object]" for your SFDC Custom object and you notice the number of records qualifying is lower than expected. The "Has [custom object]" filter pulls more records, however, and matches what you see in SFDC. Environment SFDC/Marketo Solution This is expected behavior if you have records that were already associated to the SFDC Custom object before they were pushed to Marketo. If you have records that were already associated to the SFDC Custom object before they initially synced to Marketo, those records would not have an "Added to [SFDC Custom Object]" activity on their record in Marketo, which means they would not qualify for the "Was added to [SFDC Custom Object] Smart List filter" In this scenario, it is recommended to use the "Has [SFDC Custom Object]" filter to get the accurate numbers, as this should include all Marketo records that are associated to the Custom Object, even if they were added to it prior to being synced and created in Marketo. Root Cause Records already being associated to the SFDC Custom object before they were initially synced to Marketo.

Summary Customers may face errors referencing Segmentations when importing programs between instances. Issue Program import fails giving an error message like the example below: "Marketo encountered an error while importing Nurture Program: EXAMPLE - Acquisition NUR B2B [SMB] FY24 - TEST Why: The Segmentation_Type_1003 field exists in the following objects: Person What to do now: Create a field named Segmentation_Type_1003 in the Person object." Environment Marketing Activities Import Program Solution The simplest solution would be to temporarily remove the Segmentation references from the child assets (Smart Campaigns, Smart Lists, etc.) that currently exist in the importing Program within the source instance. Once the import succeeds, references to the Segmentations can be re-added to the source (as well as the destination, if needed) instance's Program's assets.

Summary If you're using the Bulk Custom Object Import API to push records to a Marketo custom object (and you're importing separate files that have duplicates across the files) -- the records will not be deduped on the custom object if multiple imports are pushed at the same time. Issue If you are using a Bulk Custom Object Import API third party service to push records to a custom object (and multiple files, containing duplicates across those files are being imported to the Marketo custom object in a similar time window) -- the records will not be deduped on the custom object, even if the dedupe field value is matched. This is because two concurrent imports can be processed at the same time if they are pushed close together. More information can be found here. "A maximum of 2 jobs are processed at the same time. A maximum of 10 jobs are allowed in the queue at any given time (including the 2 currently being processed)." Solution In this scenario, the third-party App/API service provider that is making the bulk import calls must be consulted to ensure that separate files containing duplicate records aren't being imported to a Custom Object at the same time (or close together times). Once the calls are spaced out adequately so there aren't concurrent imports running containing duplicate records in separate import files, the custom object will dedupe as expected based on the designated dedupe fields. More on dedupe fields can be found here: "Dedupe fields can be used to retrieve, update, or delete custom objects. Every custom object definition must contain at least one (and no more than three) dedupe fields." In Summary, while Marketo does deduplicate on custom object records at import based on the dedupe field(s), it cannot dedupe when concurrent imports are being processed at the same time with duplicates in the separate files (for example: file 1 has dupe A while file 2 has dupe B). If all the duplicates are in the same file, however, Marketo can dedupe within that file as its imported to the custom object. Root Cause Concurrent Custom Object imports running at the same time: when this occurs, the two files being imported concurrently don't have time to check against each other to dedupe based on the configured dedupe field.

Summary Building a Smart List or Report for Merge Activities within time frame Issue You're looking to have a Smart List or Report built to gather insights on what merges, if any, took place within your database over a given time frame. Environment Marketo Smart List Reporting/Analytics Database API Solution Marketo doesn't have native capabilities to report on Merge activities that take place within your database, either via Smart List filters or within the Analytics section of Marketo. This is due to the activity type surrounding the merging of leads, Merge Leads, not being an attribute available for filters or reporting. The only way to go about getting a sort of list or report of the various merges that took place is to utilize the self-service Bulk Activity API endpoint and filter/specify the desired timeframe that you're wanting to look at. Please partner/consult with your Developer to go about building the job necessary to accommodate this. Below are two resources available on our Marketo Developer site to assist and offer guidance as needed. Resource(s): Bulk Activity Extract documentation Bulk Activity Extract endpoint reference(s) Root Cause Marketo doesn't offer the ability to filter off the Activity Type of Merge Leads.

Summary Aggregating/summing two score fields Issue You have two new score fields (for example: 'Implicit score' and 'explicit score') and you're wondering if there's a way to sum/aggregate these scores together for all records within Marketo. Solution To aggregate different score values together within Marketo, you should first create a third 'sum' field meant to capture the aggregate of the two scores. (Example: 'sum score') Now, we have 3 scores: Explicit Score, Implicit Score, and a Sum Score SOLUTION First, setup the scoring smart campaigns for implicit and explicit score as you normally would. Once those scoring programs are setup, add the sum score field to the flow of each respective campaign, increasing that score by the same interval that you increase the implicit or explicit score by. This should allow the scores to aggregate over time. Example 1 "Implicit Scoring campaign: Trigger: Visits web page 'x' Flow: 1. Change Score [Implicit score] Change: +5 2. Change Score [Sum score] Change: +5 Explicit Scoring campaign: Trigger: Fills out form 'y' Flow: 1. Change Score [Explicit score] Change +10 2. Change Score [Sum score] Change +10 Final result if a record runs through both campaigns > Implicit score: 5, Explicit score: 10, Sum score: 15" In the above example, the sum score flow step is simply added to each respective explicit/implicit scoring campaign, with the same change interval applied. Once applied to all relevant scoring programs in the instance, the sum score should continue aggregating the two scores into the sum score field. If you're increasing both explicit and implicit scores within one campaign instead of separating out by score type, you could also accomplish this with the same logic and instead adding the summed score interval within that same flow, for example: Example 2 "Scoring campaign: Trigger: Person is created Flow: 1. Change Score [Implicit score] Change: +3 2. Change Score [Explicit score] Change: +4 3. Change Score [Sum score] Change: +7 Result > Implicit: 3, Explicit: 4, Sum: 7" -------------------------------------------------------------------- Potential Alternative solutions: 1. Have your SFDC/CRM Admin create a workflow within the CRM which sums the two fields as they sync. This requires the score fields in question to be synced to the CRM. 2. Call a webhook, which will keep the aggregate in line with the individuals each time it's called. This would be a custom webhook implementation that Support cannot assist with. Sources for alternative solutions: How to sum Lead Scores in one aggregate score field Add two Scores in Marketo

Summary This article explains why certain Company fields show up on the Person/Lead Object when you do a describe API call to Marketo. Issue When making the Describe call on the Lead object in Marketo (/rest/v1/leads/describe.json), several Company object fields are returned along with the Lead object fields. Environment Marketo REST API Solution This is expected behavior. Users can utilize the Describe Leads call to retrieve a full list of the fields available for interaction via the REST API. Several areas within Marketo treat custom Company fields as though they were on the Person/Lead object. For example if you were doing a Bulk Import, you can target the Company and Person/Lead fields and you have the ability to update Company field values as if you were changing it manually on a Person record in the UI. Root Cause This is expected behavior, due to how the Describe call retrieves all

Issue Program member custom fields are not syncing data to Salesforce campaign member fields even though they are mapped. In this setup, the sync for Campaign Members is being performed by 'Add to SFDC Campaign' or 'Change Status in SFDC' flow-steps, but the Program itself is not set to sync with an SFDC Campaign. Environment SFDC Integration Solution This is the expected behavior, as the program member custom fields will only sync data to campaign member fields when the Salesforce Campaign Sync is setup for the Instance/Program in question. Using flow steps to sync SFDC Campaign Members will not carry over data for Program Member Custom Fields. Root Cause SFDC Campaign Sync is not enabled. Enable/Disable Campaign Sync Enable/Disable Campaign Sync | Adobe Marketo Engage Program Member Custom Field Sync Program Member Custom Field Sync | Adobe Marketo Engage

Issue Sometimes email addresses that are CC'd can have emails bounce. This doc describes what to expect in these scenarios. Solution Sending Emails To address is valid, cc address bounces The email will be sent to the recipient but the cc'ed recipient will not receive it (since the address is invalid). Nothing in the Marketo UI will communicate that the email to the cc'ed address was undeliverable. To address bounces, the cc address is valid The email to the recipient will bounce normally. The cc'ed recipient will still receive a copy of the email. Nothing in the email sent to the cc'ed recipient will tell them that the To: the address was undeliverable. To address is valid, cc address is unsubscribed The email to the recipient will deliver normally. The unsubscribed cc address will not receive the email. Nothing in the UI will reflect that the cc'ed recipient did not receive the email because of an unsubscribe setting. The cc'ed address will not appear in the Send Email activity under the cc'ed attribute. Email Delivered This will not include details of the cc'ed email addresses. There is no log item in the UI to communicate that a CC email was delivered to the recipient or bounced. Emails in the inbox The cc'ed person will be in the cc field of the email the lead receives. The links in the email will be tracked for the person in the To: line. If the cc'ed person clicks the links in the email, the 'Click Link' activity will be logged on the lead in the To: address and the cc'ed recipient will be cookied by Munchkin as the person in the To: address.

Issue You receive a page with the error "Cannot get email content" when visiting View as Webpage link in email. Solution The view as webpage link is tied to the original email asset when it was sent. Occasionally customers will say they're receiving an error message when visiting the link like so: This is a article attached image There are multiple reasons this can happen: The email was a sample send of a draft of an email that no longer exists. It was discarded, or approved. The email asset was deleted You tried to use the view as webpage token from MSI. Root Cause This issue occurs when the visit webpage link is trying to refer to an email or email version that no longer exists either because it was deleted, replaced or approved.

Knowledgebase

Maintaining a Directory of Leads Bouncing Emails

Leads stuck in Wait Step after Wait Step Change

Predictive Content Query Parameters

When I rename a field in my CRM Custom Entity/Object why is the change not reflecting in the constraint of a filter/trigger?

See Past Marketo Support Cases & Comments

Mismatch between "Added to [custom object]" and "Has [custom object]" filters

Error During Program Import

Bulk Custom Object Import API: records not deduping when being added to a custom object

Reporting on Merge Activities

Aggregating Two Score Fields

How to Add an Additional Domain for Predictive Content

Company Fields Appear in Lead Object "Describe" API Call

Program Member Custom Field Data Not Syncing To SFDC Campaign Members

CC in Email Notes

"Cannot get email content" message when visiting View as Webpage link in email.